Jump to content

Home: Difference between revisions

From Insurer Brain
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(286 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--
<div style="float:right; width:100%; max-width:320px; box-sizing:border-box; margin:0 0 1em 0; padding:.8em; border:1px solid #ddd; border-radius:8px; background:#f9f9f9;">
<div class="fullscreen-logo">
'''Quote of the day:
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]]
'''
{{Quote of the day}}
</div>
</div>
-->
<!-- Force daily refresh: {{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY2}} -->
'''Did you know?'''

__NOCACHE__
'''Looking to grow your skills? Start with our latest book summaries:
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}}
'''
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}}

| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}}
🌱 [[Tiny habits (2019) – BJ Fogg]]. Start absurdly small and celebrate to rewire behaviour.
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}}

| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}}
⚛️ [[Atomic habits (2018) – James Clear]]. Compound small improvements with clear systems.
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}}

| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}}
🔁 [[The power of habit (2012) – Charles Duhigg]]. Use cue–routine–reward to change outcomes.
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}}
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}}
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}}
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}}
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}}
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}}
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}}
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}}
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}}
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}}
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}}
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}}
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}}
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}}
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}}
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}}
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}}
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}}
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}}
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}}
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}}
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}}
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}}
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}}
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}}
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}}
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}}
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}}
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}}
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}}
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}}
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}}
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}}
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}}
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}}
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}}
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}}
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}}
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}}
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}}
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}}
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}}
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}}
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}}
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}}
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}}
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}}
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}}
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}}
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}}
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}}
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}}
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}}
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}}
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}}
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}}
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}}
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}}
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}}
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}}
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}}
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}}
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}}
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}}
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}}
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}}
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}}
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}}
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}}
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}}
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}}
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}}
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}}
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}}
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}}
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}}
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}}
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}}
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}}
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}}
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}}
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}}
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}}
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}}
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}}
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}}
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}}
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}}
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}}
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}}
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}}
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}}
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}}
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026

Did you know?

🤝 Honorable engagement clause is a provision commonly found in reinsurance contracts that obligates the parties to interpret and perform the agreement in good faith, guided by the underlying business intent rather than a strictly literal reading of the policy language. Rooted in the tradition of the London market, the clause reflects the longstanding principle that reinsurance relationships depend on mutual trust and that disputes should be resolved with fairness and commercial reasonableness rather than legalistic maneuvering.

📜 In practice, the clause directs arbitrators — reinsurance disputes are overwhelmingly resolved through arbitration rather than litigation — to consider the spirit of the contract and the reasonable expectations of the parties when adjudicating disagreements. Rather than parsing every comma, arbitrators operating under an honorable engagement standard may look at market custom, prior dealings between the cedent and reinsurer, and the commercial context in which the agreement was struck. Some versions of the clause explicitly free the arbitration panel from strict adherence to judicial rules of evidence and procedure, empowering panelists to reach an equitable outcome. The clause typically appears in the arbitration section of a reinsurance treaty or facultative certificate.

⚖️ While the honorable engagement clause promotes flexibility, it also introduces a degree of unpredictability — an arbitration panel's sense of fairness may not align with what one party believed the contract clearly required. Critics argue that the clause can undermine certainty, especially in complex excess-of-loss or retrocession disputes involving significant sums. Supporters counter that rigid textual interpretation fails to account for the bespoke, relationship-driven nature of reinsurance. For brokers and underwriters drafting reinsurance wordings, understanding the implications of including — or omitting — an honorable engagement clause is essential, as it shapes how every other provision in the contract will ultimately be interpreted if a dispute arises.

Related concepts: