Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (283 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
|||
<div style="float:right; width:100%; max-width:480px; box-sizing:border-box; margin:0 0 1em 0; padding:.8em; border:1px solid #ddd; border-radius:8px; background:#f9f9f9;"> |
|||
<div class="fullscreen-logo"> |
|||
'''Quote of the day:''' |
|||
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]] |
|||
{{Quote of the day}} |
|||
</div> |
</div> |
||
--> |
|||
<!-- Force daily refresh: {{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY2}} --> |
|||
'''Did you know?''' |
|||
__NOCACHE__ |
|||
'''Looking to grow your skills? Start with our latest book summaries: |
|||
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}} |
|||
''' |
|||
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}} |
|||
| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}} |
|||
🌱 [[Tiny habits (2019) – BJ Fogg]]. Start absurdly small and celebrate to rewire behaviour. |
|||
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}} |
|||
⚛️ [[Atomic habits (2018) – James Clear]]. Compound small improvements with clear systems. |
|||
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}} |
|||
| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}} |
|||
🔁 [[The power of habit (2012) – Charles Duhigg]]. Use cue–routine–reward to change outcomes. |
|||
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}} |
|||
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}} |
|||
[[Quotes about the meaning of life]] |
|||
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}} |
|||
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}} |
|||
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}} |
|||
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}} |
|||
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}} |
|||
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}} |
|||
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}} |
|||
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}} |
|||
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}} |
|||
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}} |
|||
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}} |
|||
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}} |
|||
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}} |
|||
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}} |
|||
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}} |
|||
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}} |
|||
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}} |
|||
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}} |
|||
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}} |
|||
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}} |
|||
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}} |
|||
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}} |
|||
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}} |
|||
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}} |
|||
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}} |
|||
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}} |
|||
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}} |
|||
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}} |
|||
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}} |
|||
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}} |
|||
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}} |
|||
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}} |
|||
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}} |
|||
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}} |
|||
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}} |
|||
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}} |
|||
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}} |
|||
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}} |
|||
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}} |
|||
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}} |
|||
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}} |
|||
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}} |
|||
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}} |
|||
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}} |
|||
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}} |
|||
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}} |
|||
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}} |
|||
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}} |
|||
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}} |
|||
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}} |
|||
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}} |
|||
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}} |
|||
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}} |
|||
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}} |
|||
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}} |
|||
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}} |
|||
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}} |
|||
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}} |
|||
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}} |
|||
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}} |
|||
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}} |
|||
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}} |
|||
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}} |
|||
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}} |
|||
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}} |
|||
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}} |
|||
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}} |
|||
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}} |
|||
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}} |
|||
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}} |
|||
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}} |
|||
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}} |
|||
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}} |
|||
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}} |
|||
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}} |
|||
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}} |
|||
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}} |
|||
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}} |
|||
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}} |
|||
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}} |
|||
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}} |
|||
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}} |
|||
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}} |
|||
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}} |
|||
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}} |
|||
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}} |
|||
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}} |
|||
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026
Did you know?
📍 Exhaustion point is the precise dollar threshold at which a lower layer of insurance or reinsurance coverage has been fully consumed by paid claims, triggering the next layer's obligation to respond. In a layered insurance program, each tier of coverage has a defined limit; when cumulative losses reach that limit, the layer is said to be "exhausted." The exhaustion point of one layer is, by design, the attachment point of the layer immediately above it, creating the seamless vertical structure that underpins large commercial and reinsurance programs.
🔄 Determining when exhaustion has actually occurred is more nuanced than it might appear. Disputes frequently arise over whether defense costs erode the underlying limit (as in many professional liability policies written on a duty-to-defend or burning limits basis) or sit outside the limit calculation. The timing of loss payments versus reserves can also complicate matters: some excess insurers require actual payment — not merely reserving — before acknowledging exhaustion. These technical questions are often addressed in the policy's other insurance and exhaustion provisions, but ambiguity in drafting has generated substantial coverage litigation over the years.
📐 For actuaries, underwriters, and risk managers, modeling the probability that losses will reach the exhaustion point of each successive layer is central to program design and pricing. If a layer is priced too cheaply because exhaustion was deemed unlikely, a single severe loss event or adverse trend can trigger unexpected recoveries that cascade through the tower. Reinsurers scrutinize exhaustion assumptions carefully during treaty negotiations, and brokers structuring towers must ensure that the terms governing exhaustion are consistent across all layers to avoid gaps or overlaps in coverage.
Related concepts: