Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (185 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- |
|||
{{Insert top}}{{Insert quote panel |
|||
<div class="fullscreen-logo"> |
|||
| {{Main Page/random quote}} |
|||
[[File:Logo of Insurer Brain.svg|frameless|center|link=]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
--> |
|||
'''Did you know?''' |
|||
__NOCACHE__ |
|||
{{#switch: {{#expr: {{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} mod 100}} |
|||
| 0 = {{:Definition:Bordereaux}} |
|||
| 1 = {{:Definition:Burning cost}} |
|||
| 2 = {{:Definition:Commutation (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 3 = {{:Definition:Finite reinsurance}} |
|||
| 4 = {{:Definition:Fronting}} |
|||
| 5 = {{:Definition:Follow-the-fortunes}} |
|||
| 6 = {{:Definition:Cut-through clause}} |
|||
| 7 = {{:Definition:Binding authority}} |
|||
| 8 = {{:Definition:Clash cover}} |
|||
| 9 = {{:Definition:Attachment point}} |
|||
| 10 = {{:Definition:Exhaustion point}} |
|||
| 11 = {{:Definition:Reinstatement premium}} |
|||
| 12 = {{:Definition:Sliding-scale commission}} |
|||
| 13 = {{:Definition:Profit commission}} |
|||
| 14 = {{:Definition:Loss portfolio transfer}} |
|||
| 15 = {{:Definition:Adverse development cover (ADC)}} |
|||
| 16 = {{:Definition:Aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 17 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 18 = {{:Definition:Per-risk excess of loss reinsurance}} |
|||
| 19 = {{:Definition:Risks-attaching basis}} |
|||
| 20 = {{:Definition:Losses-occurring basis}} |
|||
| 21 = {{:Definition:Claims-made trigger}} |
|||
| 22 = {{:Definition:Signing down}} |
|||
| 23 = {{:Definition:Sunset clause}} |
|||
| 24 = {{:Definition:Utmost good faith}} |
|||
| 25 = {{:Definition:Contra proferentem}} |
|||
| 26 = {{:Definition:Incurred but not reported (IBNR)}} |
|||
| 27 = {{:Definition:Bornhuetter-Ferguson method}} |
|||
| 28 = {{:Definition:Chain-ladder method}} |
|||
| 29 = {{:Definition:Stochastic reserving}} |
|||
| 30 = {{:Definition:Loss development triangle}} |
|||
| 31 = {{:Definition:Credibility factor}} |
|||
| 32 = {{:Definition:Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE)}} |
|||
| 33 = {{:Definition:Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)}} |
|||
| 34 = {{:Definition:Experience modification factor}} |
|||
| 35 = {{:Definition:Industry loss warranty (ILW)}} |
|||
| 36 = {{:Definition:Sidecar (reinsurance)}} |
|||
| 37 = {{:Definition:Collateralized reinsurance}} |
|||
| 38 = {{:Definition:Catastrophe bond (CAT bond)}} |
|||
| 39 = {{:Definition:Retrocession}} |
|||
| 40 = {{:Definition:Surplus share reinsurance}} |
|||
| 41 = {{:Definition:Surplus strain}} |
|||
| 42 = {{:Definition:Surplus relief}} |
|||
| 43 = {{:Definition:Funds withheld reinsurance}} |
|||
| 44 = {{:Definition:Modified coinsurance}} |
|||
| 45 = {{:Definition:Coinsurance penalty}} |
|||
| 46 = {{:Definition:Anti-concurrent causation clause}} |
|||
| 47 = {{:Definition:Continuous trigger}} |
|||
| 48 = {{:Definition:Efficient proximate cause}} |
|||
| 49 = {{:Definition:Horizontal exhaustion}} |
|||
| 50 = {{:Definition:Vertical exhaustion}} |
|||
| 51 = {{:Definition:Sue and labor clause}} |
|||
| 52 = {{:Definition:Honorable engagement clause}} |
|||
| 53 = {{:Definition:Hours clause}} |
|||
| 54 = {{:Definition:Batch clause}} |
|||
| 55 = {{:Definition:Aggregation clause}} |
|||
| 56 = {{:Definition:Omnibus clause}} |
|||
| 57 = {{:Definition:Running down clause}} |
|||
| 58 = {{:Definition:Warehouse-to-warehouse clause}} |
|||
| 59 = {{:Definition:General average}} |
|||
| 60 = {{:Definition:Particular average}} |
|||
| 61 = {{:Definition:Constructive total loss}} |
|||
| 62 = {{:Definition:York-Antwerp Rules}} |
|||
| 63 = {{:Definition:Protection and indemnity (P&I)}} |
|||
| 64 = {{:Definition:Demand surge}} |
|||
| 65 = {{:Definition:Social inflation}} |
|||
| 66 = {{:Definition:Nuclear verdict}} |
|||
| 67 = {{:Definition:Silent cyber}} |
|||
| 68 = {{:Definition:Affirmative cyber coverage}} |
|||
| 69 = {{:Definition:Parametric insurance}} |
|||
| 70 = {{:Definition:Embedded insurance}} |
|||
| 71 = {{:Definition:Takaful}} |
|||
| 72 = {{:Definition:Bancassurance}} |
|||
| 73 = {{:Definition:Microinsurance}} |
|||
| 74 = {{:Definition:Captive insurance company}} |
|||
| 75 = {{:Definition:Cell captive}} |
|||
| 76 = {{:Definition:Protected cell company (PCC)}} |
|||
| 77 = {{:Definition:Reciprocal insurance exchange}} |
|||
| 78 = {{:Definition:Risk retention group (RRG)}} |
|||
| 79 = {{:Definition:Lloyd's syndicate}} |
|||
| 80 = {{:Definition:Reinsurance to close (RITC)}} |
|||
| 81 = {{:Definition:Equitas}} |
|||
| 82 = {{:Definition:Funds at Lloyd's (FAL)}} |
|||
| 83 = {{:Definition:Syndicate-in-a-box (SIAB)}} |
|||
| 84 = {{:Definition:Part VII transfer}} |
|||
| 85 = {{:Definition:Solvent scheme of arrangement}} |
|||
| 86 = {{:Definition:Run-off (insurance)}} |
|||
| 87 = {{:Definition:Demutualization}} |
|||
| 88 = {{:Definition:Depopulation program}} |
|||
| 89 = {{:Definition:Probable maximum loss (PML)}} |
|||
| 90 = {{:Definition:Exceedance probability curve (EP curve)}} |
|||
| 91 = {{:Definition:Realistic disaster scenario (RDS)}} |
|||
| 92 = {{:Definition:Monte Carlo simulation}} |
|||
| 93 = {{:Definition:Copula}} |
|||
| 94 = {{:Definition:Bühlmann model}} |
|||
| 95 = {{:Definition:Cape Cod method}} |
|||
| 96 = {{:Definition:Extra-contractual obligation (ECO)}} |
|||
| 97 = {{:Definition:Loss in excess of policy limits (XPL)}} |
|||
| 98 = {{:Definition:Doctrine of reasonable expectations}} |
|||
| 99 = {{:Definition:Longevity swap}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== biz/books == |
|||
{{Main Page/biz/books}} |
|||
== biz/people == |
|||
* [[List of CEOs of CAC 40 companies|<u>'''CEOs of CAC 40 companies'''</u>]] / discover the portraits of the captains of French industry. |
|||
{{Quiet button|biz/people|more people|center}} |
|||
== biz/fun == |
|||
* [[CEO jokes|<u>'''CEO jokes'''</u>]] / take things lightly and laugh at the biggest boss. |
|||
{{Quiet button|biz/fun|more fun|center}} |
|||
== biz/hubs == |
|||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} |
|||
* [[biz/books]] |
|||
* [[biz/people]] |
|||
* [[biz/fun]] |
|||
{{div col end}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 12 March 2026
Did you know?
📐 Loss development triangle is a tabular display used by actuaries to organize and analyze how incurred losses or paid losses for a set of accident years (or policy years) evolve as they mature over successive evaluation periods. The triangle gets its name from its characteristic shape: the oldest accident year has the most data points running across the columns, while the most recent year has only one — creating a triangular pattern. It is the primary analytical tool used in loss reserving and serves as the foundation for calculating loss development factors.
🔍 Each row of the triangle represents a distinct origin period — most commonly an accident year — and each column represents a valuation point measured in months or years of maturity. The cells contain the cumulative claim amounts at each intersection of origin period and maturity. By reading across a single row, an analyst can observe how losses for that particular year progressed over time. By reading down a single column, one can compare the maturity profile across different origin years at the same development stage. Actuaries extract age-to-age factors from adjacent columns and use methods such as the chain-ladder technique, Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, or Cape Cod method to project the incomplete rows to their ultimate values. Triangles can be constructed on an incurred basis (reserves plus payments), a paid basis, or both, and the comparison between the two often reveals important insights about case reserving adequacy.
💡 Despite its apparent simplicity, the loss development triangle is one of the most scrutinized artifacts in insurance finance. Regulators require carriers to file Schedule P triangles in their annual statements, giving external reviewers a window into how prior estimates have held up. Significant changes in the pattern — caused by shifts in claims handling practices, social inflation, changes in business mix, or one-time events — can distort the factors derived from a triangle and lead to materially different reserve estimates. Reinsurers, rating agencies, and investors all rely on triangle analysis when evaluating an insurer's financial condition. For insurtech platforms building automated reserving tools, the ability to ingest, validate, and model triangle data accurately is a foundational technical requirement.
Related concepts