Mindset: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23:
| website = [https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/44330/mindset-by-carol-s-dweck-phd/ penguinrandomhouse.com]
}}
'''''Mindset''''' is a psychology book by Stanford University psychologist Carol S. Dweck that contrasts “fixed” and “growth” mindsets and explains how beliefs about ability shape achievement across school, work, sports, and relationships.<ref name="PRH2006" /> Drawing on decades of research, Dweck argues that seeing abilities as developable—through effort, strategies, and feedback—supports learning and resilience, whereas treating them as fixed tends to undermine persistence.<ref name="PRH2006" /> The prose is example-driven and practical (including a self-assessment checklist), and later updates add guidance on avoiding a “false growth mindset” and on applying the idea to group cultures.<ref name="PW2005">{{cite web |title=Mindset: The New Psychology of Success |url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/9781400062751 |website=Publishers Weekly |publisher=PWxyz, LLC |date=19 December 2005 |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref><ref name="PRH2006" /> The publisher bills the book as a million-copy bestseller, and its ideas continue to circulate widely among educators and managers.<ref name="PRH2006" /><ref name="WaPo2023">{{cite news |title=Growth mind-set: Why friends, family and work matter |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2023/06/19/growth-mindset/ |work=The Washington Post |date=19 June 2023 |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref> It also charted on The Washington Post’s weekly paperback nonfiction list in 2017, appearing on 25 June and again on 13 August that year.<ref name="WaPo2017Jun25">{{cite news |title=Washington Post bestsellers: June 25, 2017 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/2017/06/22/0919588c-568c-11e7-840b-512026319da7_story.html |work=The Washington Post |date=22 June 2017 |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref><ref name="WaPo2017Aug13">{{cite news |title=Washington Post bestsellers: August 13, 2017 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/2017/08/11/ab95065e-7d44-11e7-b2b1-aeba62854dfa_story.html |work=The Washington Post |date=11 August 2017 |access-date=8 November 2025}}</ref>
Line 35 ⟶ 33:
🔍 '''2 – Inside the mindsets.''' A candid personal vignette recounts chasing effortless success and a “prince‑like” partner, then finding satisfaction only after reframing ability as something developed through challenge. Working with doctoral student Mary Bandura, the narrative crystallizes two meanings of ability: a fixed quality to be proved versus a changeable capacity that grows through learning. A political theorist’s line about “learners and nonlearners” sets up experiments: four‑year‑olds choose between redoing an easy jigsaw puzzle or attempting a harder one, revealing early avoidance when “being smart” is at stake. In survey work spanning grade‑schoolers to young adults, people with fixed beliefs report feeling smart when work is flawless and fast, while those with growth beliefs feel smart when something hard begins to yield to effort. Field evidence extends the pattern: in Joseph Martocchio’s computer‑training course, trainees primed with a malleable‑skills message gained confidence through mistakes, whereas those primed to see ability as fixed lost confidence as errors accumulated. Across these cases, the same setback or exertion carries different meanings—threat and exposure versus data and progress—depending on the lens. The mechanism is a shift in goals and attributions: fixed beliefs cue performance goals and threat interpretations, while growth beliefs cue mastery goals and controllable, strategy‑focused explanations that keep people engaged. ''When you enter a mindset, you enter a new world.''
🎓 '''3 – The truth about ability and accomplishment.''' Picture Thomas Edison at work; records show he was not a lone genius but the leader of an industrial lab, with thirty assistants—many of them trained scientists—working around the clock in a corporate‑funded, state‑of‑the‑art facility to develop the lightbulb. Across fields, Benjamin Bloom’s study of 120 top performers—from concert pianists and Olympic swimmers to mathematicians—found few prodigies who were extraordinary early on; the consistent pattern was sustained motivation, coaching, and years of structured practice that turned interest into expertise. In Los Angeles, Garfield High School’s Jaime Escalante asked how to teach inner‑city students calculus rather than whether they could learn it; by 1987 only three other U.S. public schools had more students sitting for AP Calculus, and many of his largely Mexican American students scored high enough to earn college credit. Classroom beliefs matter, too: in Falko Rheinberg’s research, teachers who saw ability as fixed predicted stable achievement and taught accordingly, while growth‑oriented teachers behaved as if improvement were possible and got different results. The chapter also probes “Is artistic ability a gift?”, tracing how technique and deliberate practice—rather than mystique—underpin work that ends up in places like the Museum of Modern Art, and it warns that praising talent can make students risk‑averse, whereas process‑focused feedback keeps them tackling hard problems. The throughline is that accomplishment accumulates when people interpret effort and errors as inputs to learning rather than as verdicts on identity, and when systems around them—teachers, parents, peers—reinforce that interpretation. Because beliefs steer goals (proving versus improving) and attributions (fixed traits versus controllable strategies), they channel attention toward practice, feedback, and persistence that compound into expertise. ''However, I think we can now agree that people can do a lot more than first meets the eye.''
🏅 '''4 – Sports: the mindset of a champion.''' The sports world’s romance with the “natural” meets a counter‑example in Billy Beane: celebrated by scouts for effortless ability, he unraveled when challenged, while his teammate Lenny Dykstra kept swinging, learning, and adjusting; years later, as Oakland’s general manager, Beane prioritized mindset over mystique and guided the 2002 A’s to a near‑record winning streak on one of baseball’s leanest payrolls. The chapter broadens the lens: golfers once shunned physical training until Tiger Woods’s disciplined workouts and practice routines redefined preparation; in boxing, Muhammad Ali’s study of Sonny Liston and his psychological gamesmanship beat “natural measurements.” It highlights how champions define success and failure: Jackie Joyner‑Kersee treated the heptathlon’s 800‑meter crisis as a test of self‑talk and finished to win, while Michael Jordan publicly tallied thousands of missed shots and hundreds of losses to frame failure as data for practice. Coach John Wooden prized games his teams prepared and played well as much as titles, signaling a process standard that travels from practice plans to film study and role clarity. The pattern repeats: fixed‑mindset stars protect image, blame noise, and avoid weaknesses; growth‑mindset athletes seek coaching, attack shortcomings, and translate setbacks into specific work. Champions’ edge is not a birthright but a habit of attention—toward preparation details, controllable levers, and feedback loops—that makes improvement inevitable and reputation a by‑product. Because beliefs about athletic ability set goals (validation versus mastery) and define what effort and failure mean, they determine whether pressure exposes ego or reveals a path to skill. ''In sports, like academics and business, you can’t succeed indefinitely on talent alone.''
💼 '''5 – Business: mindset and leadership.'''
| |||